Gangs
of Cave Creek
by
Evan Christopher
On
my first trip to Cave Creek, I wondered why so many Hispanics
were hanging around on the street. Could it be Coppola was
filming a sequel to his hit movie and calling it “Gangs
of Cave Creek,” or was something more insidious in the air?
When someone told me they were looking for work, I breathed
a sigh of relief.
Where
I come from back East, groups of loiterers conjure ominous
imagery as they are more likely looking for opportunity–
but in the form of victims rather than labor. I find it
refreshing that these gangs of loiterers in Cave Creek are
seeking honest, self‑sustaining employment, and not
the more nefarious type of work I associate with gangs.
In
light of my East Coast perspective, just what is so bad
about all these people looking for work? Isn’t this search
for work one of the central posits of capitalism, the economic
system we embrace
in the United States?
Thus,
it seems these hunters of labor are only following the American
way, which last time I checked was to improve one’s lot
in life as well as the lot of one’s family. For this I can’t
blame them. Obviously they wouldn’t be congregating in locales
where no work was to be found. Somehow these “illegal” people
milling about Cave Creek Road must function positively in
the local economy, else they’d long since been run out of
town, or have cast off for greener pastures. Certainly no
crime waves have befallen the area since I’ve been commuting
to Cave Creek, so therein lies not the problem.
So
what gives with all this border state complaining?
Like
much of America, my city and this area are not that much
different. This country has a history of accepting newcomers,
(which in America seems to mean discrimination against each
new wave of immigrants until the next group arrives, hence
moving the preceding ethnic group up a ladder rung closer
to the tolerant masses and firmly placing the arriving group
on the bottom).
When
viewing the history of Boston, we could easily look to the
waves of Europeans–even freedmen during Abolitionist times–who
made their homes there. Not always was and is everyone singularly
happy with each other, but in due time, all settle in. It
seems that Arizonans (and citizens of other border states)
are simply participating in cyclical American history.
I
wonder if that’s where Native Americans went wrong–they
failed to check the Pilgrims’ papers and refuse entry with
their own Minutemen. If the Indians weren’t so welcoming
and forgiving of the undocumented Pilgrims, we’d have no
America, (and gadzooks, no Thanksgiving, for which generations
of turkeys and Detroit Lions’ fans could be thankful). What
I’m getting after, without minimizing the heinous eradication
of America’s indigenous peoples, is that this country has
always been a grudgingly welcoming land. So why does this
latest immigration grudge run so deep?
From
an inexperienced viewpoint of logistics, I grudgingly wish
border states the best of luck with the implausibility and
impossibility
of sealing the border. Native Americans didn’t have much
luck with denying entry to newcomers; border states will
arrive at the same results.
For
the complainers who can’t cease flapping their gums–politically
or otherwise–and reap the benefits of this era’s wave of
integration, I suggest, while not necessarily condoning,
investigating the law Hazelton, Penn. has enacted. Hazelton
has passed a law that A) fines landlords $1000 a day for
renting to illegal immigrants; B) for five years suspends
licenses to businesses that employ illegal immigrants; and
C) requires city documents to be in English only. Individuals
seeking to rent a dwelling have to apply to the city for
a residency license, and submit to an investigation of citizenship
status.
Other
cities have followed suit in modified versions, and the
response from ethnic groups, particularly the Hispanic groups
who feel targeted, has been that of anger. In addition,
the legality of the laws will soon be challenged in state
and, one surmises, federal courts (costing taxpayers a bundle
of money, another characteristic of the American way). But
the enaction of these laws at least cuts down on the complaining
and the all too common political posturing we see in this
state of all the anti‑immigrant forces. So while not
supporting the effort, I would suggest organizing, collecting
signatures, and putting a similar referendum on the ballot.
And then all this cancerous palaver can be put to a vote
and put to rest, one way or another.