The Desert Advocate - News The Desert Advocate -  News Center
Editor | Links | Contact Us | Home
The Desert Advocate - Submissions
Classifieds | News | Events
News Real Estate Community Sports Marketplace Arts & Entertainment Archives About Us Testimonials
Weather >
No trail, no access, we lose Black Mountain Preserve!

Mayor Francia, Councilwoman Brennan, and Councilmen Esser and Bunch are to be applauded for their efforts to preserve Black Mountain Summit. Past councilman Ralph Mozilo criticized these folks in his letter printed in the Scottsdale Republic.

Mozilo speaks of "sound economic reasons" to keep the trail closed, yet economics/price tag did not deter his support of purchasing and maintaining 2,100 acres of Spur Cross Ranch-a $6.5 million price tag with Creekers getting a property tax in place for the first time to pay the bonds.

If economics were the sole consideration, there would be no Phoenix Mountains Preserve, no Squaw Peak Trail, no Camelback Mountain Trail, no Pinnacle Peak Trail, no McDowell Sonoran Preserve, no Spur Cross-and no open space.

Additionally, he pushed voters for an $8 million purchase of Cave Creek Water Company and $30 million for an improved sewer plant, all to ensure annexation of state trust land on the west side with the hopes of getting open space and trails contiguous to his property. Where is his concern there for costs or trail maintenance?

Mozilo says there are environmental reasons to eliminate hiking the summit. Wrong, as it's been done for over 40 years and the trail and surrounding areas show very little wear and tear. It is still a primitive, narrow path and can remain so. Of greater interest is that over 40 years of use has not cost County Parks/Cave Creek one penny to maintain.

The most important fact, and why the mayor and three council members made the right decision, is that the U.S. Patent Deed granting the acres to Maricopa County in 1972 has a very important clause that reads if the patentee or its successor attempts to transfer title to another and the lands are devoted to a use "other than recreational purposes," title to the land shall revert to the United States.

No access, no trail, 250 acres revert back! Can you imagine the BLM regaining that land and putting it to auction to the highest bidder? Can you say 250 homes?

What town in this state would not look with envy upon Cave Creek to be able to pick up 250 acres of open space for minimal cost in the heart of their town core?

And what a legacy to leave future generations-the ability to gain from this mountain, not as a tourist attraction or number of users, but the effect it has on the heart and the soul upon reaching the top.

Anna Marsolo
Cave Creek
 
 
Back To Community

© 2006 The Desert Advocate
6528 E Cave Creek Rd Ste B | Cave Creek, AZ 85331-8646
480.488.1204 | 480.488.6248 Fax