Trust
land initiative would join referendum on ballot
by Paul Davenport
Associated Press
ARIZONA
– Voters apparently will have a choice of competing
measures on management and conservation of millions
of acres of Arizona state land heldin trust for public
schools and other beneficiaries.
The
state has 9.3 million acres of trust land provided by
the federal government at statehood. Under the Arizona
Constitution and federal law, the land and the income
it produces must be used to benefit schools or other
designated purposes that now don’t include conservation.
The
Legislature last week voted to put a referendum on the
ballot. Backed by groups representing ranchers, farmers
and home builders, the measure wouldimpose new planning
requirements for trust land intended to have the state
produce more money for public schools and other beneficiaries
but also allow some land to be set aside for open‑space
conservation.
On
Friday, supporters of an initiative–a measure originally
proposed before the referendum was introduced–planned
to file what they said were more than enough voter signatures
on petitions
to qualify it for the November ballot.
The
initiative supporters, who included conservation groups
and the Arizona Education Association (AEA),
said they collected 301,000 voter signatures, well above the 183,917 signatures
required for proposed state constitutional amendments.
Like
the referendum, the initiative would set new planning
requirements to boost income for beneficiaries. But
it also would designate more land for conservation and
create a new board to oversee the Land Department’s
administration of trust land.
“Increased
revenues from the sale of state trust lands will go
directly into the classroom, and better‑planned
communities and open space will ensure a better qualify
of life for our kids,” AEA President John Wright said
in a statement prepared in advance of the petition filing.
“This conservation‑education partnership is a
once‑in‑a‑lifetime opportunity.”
Home
builders, ranchers, conservationists and education groups
were all in one camp on the issue in 2004 when they
asked the Legislature to put a compromise proposal on
that year’s ballot. But that effort–the product of years
of negotiations–fell short, leading to the rival efforts
now proposed.
Other
initiatives already filed for the November ballot include
ones to restrict public smoking, create a new state
minimum wage higher than the existing federal one and
randomly reward Arizona voters with a lottery‑like
payout.