Like
most people,
you probably
gravitate
toward
things
you’re
familiar
with and
that you
like.
If you
enjoy
classical
music,
your shelves
may be
full of
Beethoven
and Ravel.
If you
love pasta,
your cupboards
may be
bulging
with spaghetti
and ravioli.
In most
parts
of your
life,
there’s
nothing
wrong
with this
type of
devotion
– but,
if it’s
carried
over to
your investment
portfolio,
you could
run into
problems.
Specifically,
you don’t
want to
own too
many of
the same
types
of stocks
or mutual
funds
– even
if you
like these
investments
and are
generally
pleased
with their
performance.
What’s
wrong
with “the
more,
the merrier”
approach
to investing?
Simply
put, it’s
too risky.
Suppose
you own
a bunch
of stocks
of companies
that belong
to the
same industry,
or to
just a
couple
of related
industries.
If a particular
set of
economic
or market
forces
hurt these
industries,
then your
stocks
are going
to take
a hit
– and
if most
of your
investment
dollars
are tied
up in
these
holdings,
your overall
portfolio
will take
a hit,
too.
You
might
think
that you
can avoid
this problem
of “overconcentration”
by investing
in mutual
funds.
After
all, mutual
funds
may invest
in dozens
of different
companies
at any
time,
so you’re
protected
from any
industry‑specific
downturns,
aren’t
you? Actually,
it’s not
quite
that simple.
There
are many
different
types
of mutual
funds
available
on the
market,
and some
of them
do concentrate
in a particular
market
segment,
such as
technology.
And when
something
happens
that affects
these
segments,
such as
the bursting
of the
technology
“bubble”
in 2001,
these
types
of mutual
funds
will be
negatively
affected.
If, in
2001,
you owned
just one
technology‑heavy
fund,
your overall
portfolio
probably
wasn’t
shaken
up too
much,
but if
you had
several
of these
funds,
you would
definitely
have felt
some pangs
of regret
when you
opened
your investment
statement.
Keep
this in
mind:
Different
investments
may respond
differently
to the
same market
forces.
To give
just one
example,
a steep
rise in
interest
rates
may hurt
the stocks
of financial
services
companies,
but have
relatively
little
effect
on pharmaceutical
stocks.
On the
other
hand,
certain
legal
or regulatory
changes
can have
a big
impact
on drug
company
stocks,
but not
cause
a stir
in the
financial
services
industry.
Consequently,
if you
spread
your investment
dollars
among
different
types
of stocks
and mutual
funds
(as well
as bonds,
certificates
of deposit
and government
securities),
you’ll
be less
vulnerable
to those
forces
– all
beyond
your control
– that
may affect
one particular
class
of assets.
Diversification
does not
guarantee
a profit
nor does
it protect
against
loss.
And
here’s
one more
reason
to expand
your investment
horizons:
You probably
won’t
be able
to achieve
all your
financial
goals
if you
only own
one type
of investment,
such as
growth
stocks
or growth‑oriented
mutual
funds.
Over time,
you will
have other
considerations,
such as
the need
for income,
so you’ll
need to
address
this in
your portfolio.
These
factors
also affect
the way
you approach
your 401(k)
or other
employer‑sponsored
retirement
plan.
You
may have
a dozen
or more
investment
options
in your
plan,
so don’t
just stick
with one
or two
of them.
In
the investment
world,
you’ve
got many
choices–so
take advantage
of this
freedom
and flexibility.
It can
potentially
pay off
in the
long run.