The Desert Advocate - News The Desert Advocate -  News Center
Editor | Links | Contact Us | Home
The Desert Advocate - Submissions
Classifieds | News | Events
News Real Estate Community Sports Marketplace Arts & Entertainment Archives About Us Testimonials Classifieds
  Weather >

The Pluto controversy explained
by Dan Heim

The solar system as you knew it

If you thought you learned everything about the solar system in grade school, think again. Nine planets orbiting the Sun in neat circles is a good model for learning the names, but it misses most of what astronomers have discovered in the last 50 years.

So many unusual objects have been found, they challenge our ability to classify and label them. This was the catalyst for the recent change in Pluto’s status from “planet” to “dwarf planet.” The reclassification has received criticism from both professional and amateur astronomers.

IAU Resolution 5a

On August 24, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) voted to redefine the term “planet” and exclude Pluto. Pluto had been a planet for 76 years, since discovery by Clyde Tombaugh at Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff. 

The IAU resolution defines “planet” by three criteria. A planet must:‑orbit the Sun.

‑exert enough gravity to form itself into a sphere.

‑have cleared its orbit of debris and other small bodies.

Pluto fails the third criterion. It orbits in the Kuiper Belt, a region containing thousands of other small bodies. This belt extends from Neptune to beyond Pluto. Major planets orbit the Sun a neat, flat plane, but Kuiper Belt objects have orbits that are tilted at weird angles. Pluto’s is tilted 17 degrees.

Why labels are important

The first science learned in school is “classification.” Is it a plant or an animal, igneous or sedimentary, planet or moon? Classification is important in science. It lets us group things with similar properties–the first step toward understanding.

Here, the IAU was recognizing the likely different origin of Kuiper Belt bodies. Origins are also important to scientists. Henceforth, unless their decision is reversed, Pluto is officially a “dwarf planet.”

What would Clyde say?

I had the privilege of meeting Tombaugh in 1988 when he was speaking to local astronomy clubs about his discovery. Pluto’s large moon Charon had been discovered in 1978. The IAU was considering reclassifying Pluto/ Charon as a “double planet,” due to the size of its moon. I asked Clyde how he felt about this. His prompt reply was, “It’s a planet ¼ has been for 50 years. Leave it alone.”

His response may seem almost curmudgeonly in retrospect, but it’s an appeal to history. The meaning of “planet” has changed often. To the ancients, planets were celestial lights that varied in brightness and moved through the constellations. To Galileo, inventor of the telescope, they were worlds with visible geography. To us, they’re a mix of geology and meteorology. Some are made of rock, others of gas, one might be a ball of water.

New knowledge is the business of science, and classifications will continue to multiply.  But discovery only happens once.

Dan Heim, is president of the Desert Foothills Astronomy Club.

Back To Community

© 2006 The Desert Advocate
6528 E Cave Creek Rd Ste B | Cave Creek, AZ 85331-8646
480.488.1204 | 480.488.6248 Fax