More
U.S. companies promote gay friendly policies to attract
talent, new report says
by
Vinnie Tong
Associated
Press
NEW
YORK – Because of an increasingly common policy at
U.S. companies, Vivienne Armstrong can choose from
two different plans when she considers her health
insurance: the one offered by her employer and one
offered by her partner’s.
Armstrong,
a registered nurse, gets her health coverage through
the defense firm Raytheon Co., which offers domestic
partner benefits to her partner, Louise Young. Young,
a senior software engineer in the Plano, Texas office,
said Armstrong chose Raytheon’s plan simply because
it has stronger benefits.
Young,
a lesbian activist, said she is encouraged by signs
of the growth of gay‑friendly corporate policies
within her industry and in corporate America. And
a lobby group, the Human Rights Campaign, reports
that gay‑friendly policies are being added at
a greater number of companies, where they are a draw
to prospective employees gay and straight.
“Some
of our competitors are starting to emulate our good
workplace policies,” Young said.
Raytheon
was touted as the first in its industry to earn a
perfect score from the Human Rights Campaign in 2005.
To earn a perfect score, companies must offer domestic
partners health and other wellness benefits, enact
nondiscrimination policies for sexual orientation
and gender identity, and support GLBT resource groups
and events.
The
HRC recently released its newest list tracking company
policies on rights for gay, lesbian,
bisexual and transgender employees, and this time
it included
three other defense contractors: Boeing Co., Honeywell
International Inc. and
Northrop Grumman Corp.
Companies
in the automotive, pharmaceutical and consulting industries,
as well as law firms, followed a similar pattern with
more firms added to the list.
Joe
Solmonese, the president of the Human Rights Campaign,
attributes that to the growing sentiment among both
gay and straight employees that companies should not
only tolerate but encourage diversity of all kinds,
including that of a sexual nature.
“The
phenomenon of competition is actually an interesting
one,” Solmonese said. “What we’re seeing when we’re
looking at specific industries, we see an emerging
sense that if more than a few are at 100 percent,
then we all need to be at 100 percent.”
The
HRC started its annual review in 2002. Since then,
it has grown in visibility as an indicator of the
type of culture a company cultivates, which is increasing
in importance for gay and straight employees, Solmonese
said.
“All
of these things are motivated by what is good for
business,” he said. “I hear from corporate leaders
every week, that they went after a very sought‑after
person, and they hear the question of whether they
have domestic partner benefits. For straight applicants,
it’s a measure of the corporate culture.”
The
report’s list–it grew to 138 from 101–expands in part
because more companies are becoming aware of its existence
and deciding it is important to apply. Among the new
additions in 2006: Anheuser‑Busch Companies
Inc., Bank of America Corp., ClearChannelCommunications
Inc., General Motors Corp., Google Inc., Morgan Stanley,
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, and Visa
International.
Like
Raytheon, Ernst & Young claims the distinction
of being first from its industry to make the list.
Mike Syers, a partner at the accounting firm, attributes
that in part to the early grassroots effort among
employees. He was a founding member of bEYond, the
firm’s GLBT employee group.
Chip
Faught, associate director for national tax at Ernst
& Young, and his partner Nathan Monell used the
company’s financial assistance to help bring their
adopted son and daughter from Guatemala in late May
of last year. Faught received $5,000 per child in
assistance and company policies, he said, gave him
the flexibility to complete the adoption process including
three trips to Guatemala.
Syers
said that gay‑friendly policies, while good
for employees, are good for business as well.
“We
have companies realizing they really can’t afford
to exclude anyone,” he said. “Younger people
are coming out of college and are out and open in
their public lives. They’re not going to go back into
the closet to begin their professional careers.”
At
Merrill Lynch, the sense that gay‑friendliness
is important has actually translated into business
opportunities. The firm’s Domestic Partner Financial
Foundation helps couples plan their financial lives,
and Merrill Lynch manages the endowments of a number
of GLBT nonprofits.
Todd
Sears, a senior financial adviser in Merrill Lynch’s
global private client group, said corporate America–more
than the general public–realizes the value of GLBT
employees and
consumers.
“Companies
like Merrill Lynch understand that the LGBT community
supports companies who support us, and will not do
business with companies who do not,” Sears said.
In
many cases, the changing policies ultimately affect
the culture
of the office.
Philip
Adkins first worked at the law firm Arnold & Porter,
based in Washington, D.C., from 1989 to 1993. He left
for another job, but returned to the law firm in 1997.
He said the firm’s policies
have been a big factor in his job satisfaction and
desire to work there.
Adkins,
the director of benefits at Arnold & Porter, said
that when workers see support for the sexual diversity
policies among top managers, that sends a message.
“It
filters down,” he said.