The Desert Advocate - News The Desert Advocate -  News Center
Editor | Links | Contact Us | Home
The Desert Advocate - Submissions
Classifieds | News | Events
News Real Estate Community Sports Marketplace Arts & Entertainment Archives About Us Testimonials Classifieds
 
Weather >
 

At this point of the topsy turvy world chess championship, everything is very unclear.

Last week we talked about the comfortable lead Vladimir Kramnik had taken when the tournament was thrown into chaos with allegations of cheating. With the resumption of play came a series of draw games until Veselin Topalov managed to win two games in a row, games 8 and 9, thrusting the Bulgarian into the lead by one point.

Several questions then arose, one of them manifest. The forfeit point that Topalov undeservedly won in game 5 was the principal concern as Kramnik accepted to play only after lodging a protest with FIDE, which has not yet issued a decision. If this forfeit point decides who the next undisputed world champion will be, a huge new scandal will be upon us in short order.

Out of historical context, chess observers envisaged a comeback from Topalov in the second half of the tournament as that is Topalov’s style. He made it to the top by winning the main tournaments in the second half, and in actuality, the world championship that he took in Argentina provides a great example of his signature play. There he occupied last place at several points in the first half, but then in the second, he won out to attain victory.

Kramnik’s performances are very different. It is no secret that Kramnik’s health is ailing. That means in the long tournaments such as this world championship, he usually begins to wane in the second half.

While the predictions came true, the Oct. 9 game contradicted the players’ tendencies. Kramnik triumphed and the score was tied again at 5‑5. What a surprise. This is even stranger when one analyzes the game. Topalov had staked a comfortable position where he needed not take risks in order to draw. But move 24 turned the game upside down. Topalov made a terrible              mistake and Kramnik showed him no mercy.

One would not have expected to see so many blunders in a world championship, but chess sometimes plays out in unforeseen ways. Undoubtedly, the scandals have negatively affected the play of the contenders. But after a draw leaving the two knotted at 5 ½ points each, the twelfth and final game on Oct. 12 brings us to as exciting a conclusion as chess fans could hope for. Who knows? Perhaps we’ll even see a historic playoff to top off this controversial tournament.

Kramnik, Vladimir (ELO: 2743) ‑ Topalov, Veselin (2813) [E08‑ Bogolyubov Defense] World Championship, Elista, Russia (10th Game), Oct. 8, 2006.
 

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 0–0 7.0–0 c6 8.Bf4 Nbd7 9.Qc2 a5?! It is not that this move had never been played before, but the development of the black pieces does not look too optimistic. More oft‑played variations seem  better to me. For example [9...b6 10.Rd1 Bb7 11.Nc3 Rc8] 10.Rd1 Nh5 11.Bc1 b5 12.cxd5!? Novelty. Normally 12.c5 is played. 12...cxd5 13.e4 dxe4 14.Qxe4 Rb8 15.Qe2 Nhf6 The complicated side lines in the opening drive Topalov to an unpleasant position. The black pieces are undeveloped and his queen pawns are weak. Topalov looked for some counter play by dominating d5, but that is not enough. 16.Bf4 Rb6 17.Ne5! Menacing with 18.Nc6 17...Nd5 18.Bxd5! Fearless move! Now d5 becomes a weakness for black. 18...exd5 19.Nc3 Nf6 20.Nxb5 By keeping the initiative, white has won a pawn, which does not make a big difference now, but in end game gives Kramnik a good air bag. 20...Ba6 21.a4 Ne4 22.Rdc1! Qe8 The idea was [22...Nd6] but now is not possible because of 23.Nc6 23.Rc7 Bd8 24.Ra7 In the diagram 24...f6?? Terrible blunder! [24...Bxb5 25.axb5 Qxb5 26.Qxb5 Rxb5 27.Ra2 f6 28.Nc6 Bb6 29.Rb7 Rf7 30.Rb8+ Rf8 meant an almost sure draw game because d4 is weak and white can balance the situation.] 25.Nd7! Rf7 26.Nxb6 Rxa7 27.Nxd5 Rd7 28.Ndc3 Rxd4 If instead [28...Re7 29.Qc4+ Kh8 30.Nd5 Qf7 31.Rc1] the two extra pawns would do to win the game. 29.Re1 Even better was [29.f3 Bb6 30.Kg2] But it is fine that Kramnik opted for a more solid variation. 29...f5 30.Qc2! Rb4 31.Nd5 Rxb5 32.axb5 Qxb5 33.Nc7 Qc4 34.Qd1 Bxc7 35.Qd7 Menacing 36.De8# 35...h6 36.Qxc7 Qb4 37.Qb8+ Qxb8 38.Bxb8 Nd2 39.Ra1 g5 40.f4 Nb3 41.Ra3 Bc4 42.Bc7 g4 43.Bxa5 1–0

Accredited by the Chess Federation of Madrid in Spain, Carlos García Hernández teaches chess at Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany. His weekly chess column appears in the German newspaper Neues Deutschland.

 
Back To Sports & Education

© 2006 The Desert Advocate
6528 E Cave Creek Rd Ste B | Cave Creek, AZ 85331-8646
480.488.1204 | 480.488.6248 Fax