The Desert Advocate - News The Desert Advocate -  News Center
Editor | Links | Contact Us | Home
The Desert Advocate - Submissions
Classifieds | News | Events
News Real Estate Community Sports Marketplace Arts & Entertainment Archives About Us Testimonials Classifieds
 
Weather >

 

During the tournament between Vladimir Kramnik and Deep Fritz 10, another man versus machine match was taking place in Florence during the Festival of Creativity organized by the government of that famous Italian city.

The human player was twenty‑year‑old Grand Master Teimour Radjabov, from Azerbaijan. The computer he played against was Deep Junior 10, a program developed by Israeli scientists.

Both players, the human as well as the cybernetic, have several brilliant accomplishments on their résumés.

Teimour Radjabov was once the Junior World Champion, and today he has the eleventh highest ELO on the planet. Deep Junior 10 won the Computer Chess World Championship celebrated during the last Chess Olympics in Turin.

Only one game was played this time. The young Azerbaijani opted for playing as aggressively as he "humanly" could, which probably led to his defeat. The time control, ninety minutes per player, plus twenty‑five seconds after each move, provided a pretty severe challenge and perhaps a slightly more conservative strategy would have been more apropos.

The human played very well and was able to seize the initiative in the early stages of the game. In the middle game, the situation remained fairly even. Problems arose as Radjabov played all his chances in the endgame.

Then, as you will be able to see in the diagram, the position of the pieces became incredibly complicated and the analytical capacities of the lithium brain won again. The result is very clear– the second loss from two of the best human players against the new high‑tech chess programs, which means hard times have fallen upon the neurons.

 

Radjabov, Teimour (ELO: 2729) vs. Deep Junior [D43‑ Semi Slav Defence]

Festival della Creativita, Florence, Italy December 3, 2006

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 c6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 dxc4 7.e4 g5 8.Bg3 b5 9.Be2 Bb7 10.0–0 Nbd7 11.Ne5 h5 12.Nxd7 Qxd7 13.Be5 Rh6 14.Qc1 Nh7! Novelty. 15.f4 Be7 16.Qe3 0–0–0 17.Rad1 f6 18.fxg5 fxe5! The computer shows a very developed sense of compensation. The natural continuation [18...fxg5 19.Rf7 Rf8 20.Rg7 Nf6 21.Rf1] loses. 19.gxh6 exd4 20.Qg3 Qe8 21.Qg7 Rd7! After [21...d3 22.Qxh7 Bc5+ 23.Kh1 Rd7 24.Bxh5 Qxh5] the position is very unclear. 22.Rf7 Ng5 [22...Bf6 23.Rxd7 Bxg7 24.Rxg7 dxc3 25.bxc3 c5 26.Bf3 b4 27.Rxh7 bxc3=] 23.Rxe7! His young blood drove Radjabov to decide everything in the endgame and gives the quality back to his lithium nemesis. [23.Bxh5 Nxf7 24.Qxf7 Qxf7 25.Bxf7 dxc3 26.Bxe6 c2 27.Bxd7+ Kc7 28.Rc1 Kxd7 29.Rxc2=] 23...Qxe7 24.Qxe7 Rxe7 25.Rxd4 Rh7 26.h4 Nf7 27.Bxh5 Ne5 28.Be2 c5 29.Rd1 Bc6! White wins after [29...b4!? 30.Nb5 Bc6 31.a4 bxa3 32.Nxa3 Rxh6 33.Nxc4 Nxc4 34.Bxc4 Rxh4 35.Bxe6+] 30.g4 b4 31.Nb1 Rxh6 32.h5 Rh8 33.Kf2 Bxe4 34.g5 Bd3 35.h6 Bh7 36.Rg1 Rd8 37.Bh5?! [37.Ke3 Rd4 38.a3] would have probably meant a draw. 37...Ng6 38.Bxg6 Bxg6 39.Rh1 Kd7 40.Nd2 In the diagram 40...c3!! 41.bxc3 bxc3 42.Nc4 c2 43.Ne3 Not better for white. [43.Rc1 Kc7 44.Ne3 Rd2+ 45.Ke1 Rh2] 43...Ke7 44.h7 Rh8 45.Ke2 Be4! 0–1.

Accredited by the Chess Federation of Madrid in Spain, Carlos García Hernández teaches chess at Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany. His weekly chess column appears in the German newspaper Neues Deutschland.

 
Back To Arts & Entertainment

© 2006 The Desert Advocate
6528 E Cave Creek Rd Ste B | Cave Creek, AZ 85331-8646
480.488.1204 | 480.488.6248 Fax