|
Who called
the dogs out?
Anthem resident says Animal Care and Control has overstepped its
authority
by Barry
Cohen
"Who called the dogs out?" Or in this case, Maricopa
County Animal Care and Control?
Nobody associated with the Anthem Community Association, insists
Executive Director Steve Peterman.
"We had no involvement whatsoever in contacting Maricopa
County Animal Care and Control about dog owners using the private
baseball field in Anthem Community Park," said Peterman.
"All we've heard are rumors-that it was a private citizen
who was tired of seeing people let their dogs off leash on the
field."
No matter who dropped the dime, pet owners using the field were
surprised when Animal Control officers-accompanied by an officer
from the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office-showed up one Sunday
morning in late January at their de facto dog park, citation pads
in hand. After all, the pet owners had been using the Sunday morning
gathering spot for more than four years and their ranks had grown
to between 40 and 50.
Anthem resident and dog owner Michael Little said he believes
the call to Animal Control came from an official of Del Webb/Pulte
Homes and/or the Anthem Community Association. But regardless
of who called, stated Little, Animal Care and Control had no legal
authority to enter the field and cite people for having their
dogs off a leash because the field is private property, owned
by Anthem and its residents.
"County Ordinance 13 is perfectly clear," explained
Little, who is an attorney. "It states 'If any dog is at
large on the public streets, public parks or public property,
then said dog's owner or custodian is in violation of this ordinance.'
The park is private property, so ACC had no jurisdiction."
Not so, according to Julie Banks, deputy director of Animal Care
and Control. "Even though the park is fenced, it's not designated
as a dog park," she explained, adding that the Anthem complaint
came from a private citizen. "It's not like someone's private
backyard. Because the ball field is open to dog owners and nonowners
alike, if someone has his pet off a leash in the park, he can
be cited."
Little disputes Banks' interpretation of the law, but evidently
the courts don't agree with him because the Anthem residents who
were cited paid fines in North Valley Justice Court in Glendale
for their violations.
According to Banks, each of those cited had their dogs off a leash
outside the baseball field, not inside its confines.
Little said he isn't giving up. This past weekend he wrote to
the Maricopa County Attorney, asking that office to initiate an
investigation of Animal Care and Control and MCSO for acting "under
the color of law," i.e. outside their scope of authority.
If he gets no satisfaction, he plans to contact the F.B.I.
In his letter, Little also contended Del Webb Corp/Pulte Homes
refuses to build a dog park in Anthem even though the company's
other developments, such as Sun City, have one.
Peterman pointed out that a dog park was never contemplated in
Anthem, that one was never in the master plan for the community.
"Nobody's trying to give them (dog park supporters) the run
around," he said. "The citizens of Anthem should have
the opportunity to weigh in on any modification to a community
asset. We've asked the dog park supporters to come forward with
a proposal backed by some research. Only then can we consider
it."
Peterman stated that even if a dog park is approved in the future,
the Anthem Community Association probably wouldn't want to be
responsible for it because of potential liability issues. "We
might consider granting a ground lease to the dog park owners,"
he added. They, in turn, would be responsible for funding, maintaining
and insuring it."
|